Off2riorob ( talk) 15:44, 20 March 2010 (UTC) The article is getting to be utter codswallop, User:Guru Sant Singh and his socks keep adding the same gibberish, which is one person's opinion, none of which has been shown to be relevant to this article except in passing. There are excessive overly long quoted or copied sections of text in obituaries and the kundalini yoga section, this content should be summaries and shortened, also there is excessive content in the footnotes, the complete retraction request for example and some of the other stuff, if it has any real value add it to the article if now then it is of little value to the reader and simply serves to elongate the article necessarily. Also Rick ross is not a reliable citation. contribs) 07:31, 18 March 2010 (UTC) Comment.There is no value to excessive legal jargon,the average reader can not understand it and it is currently masking the article unreadable, also there are an excessive amount of primary citations, we need reliable secondary citations, not the original court doc or legal document but independent reports of what happened.Preceding unsigned comment added by Guru Sant Singh ( talk I put the lawsuits back as I think they are very important. Preceding unsigned comment added by Guru Fatha Singh Khalsa ( talk But since these were neither memorable nor significant, why should they be included in a wiki article about their amazing lives and tremendous contributions? Of course, they should not and consequently, they are not. also dealt with vexatious and petty litigations. In the big picture, it should not surprise us if Mother Theresa, Pope John Paul II and Martin Luther King, Jr. (If you want to write about cases of wrongful confinement and rape, you can supplement your wiki bio with details about your work as a “deprogrammer,” kidnapping and subjecting your unwilling guests to your brainwashing techniques.) None of the three cases you mention was successful and dragging them up clearly serves no purpose but your own. In summation, you are on the wrong case and you've got the wrong man, Mr.
I might add that the notable students (see the Notable Students section of the article) of Yogi Bhajan – people of staunch morale fibre, superior intelligence and high ideals, would certainly have denounced their teacher or simply abandoned him had they believed there was any substance to the allegations made against him. Moreover, one of the plaintiffs, Premka returned to New Mexico in 2000 and was employed for a time by a 3HO company as she sought to reconcile herself with Yogi Bhajan. He also shared Shabbat with Rabbi Shlomo Carlebach.Īs I indicated in previous editions of these sections you inserted into the article, at least one of these legal cases of the 1980s was funded by third parties with an interest in defaming Yogi Bhajan.
If it is a reputable Jewish connection you are after, I can tell you that Yogi Bhajan was a good acquaintance of the former Head Chaplain of the U.S. Rick Ross aka “Sharkbait” has inserted these hackneyed and libellous sections (poorly written, with word for word redundency) about unsuccessful litigations for one reason alone: to slander a great American who does not fit into his Judeo-Christian model of what a good man should be and do, and incidentally to attempt to enlarge his case file as a deprogrammer. Anyone who seriously looks at the remarkable contributions Yogi Bhajan has made, as sketched out in the article, in areas from the healing arts to interfaith dialogue to standing firm against terrorism, will come away impressed, if not amazed at his consistent humanity and passion for peace and the good of all. I am removing the legal issues sections – both of them – for the simple reason that in the big scope of things, they do not merit mention in an article about a man of the caliber of Yogi Bhajan, a religious figure considered by the United States Congress to be in the same elevated category as just three other individuals, Mother Theresa, Pope John Paul II, and Martin Luther King, Jr. 25 Ban Something Something Singh Khalsa from Editing.24 Standard of evidence for posthumous, non-courthouse allegations.19 Beginning to address concerns listed at top of page, NPOV.15 This Wiki is an utter sham everything negative has been redacted from the site.14 Litigation Section and Miri Piri Academy Article Censored.13 Suggestions for Neutralizing the article.8 Kundalini Yoga as Taught by Yogi Bhajan.2.1 An Abstract of the Suppressed Public Record of Lawsuits.
0 kommentar(er)
